Some Helmet Program Evaluations
Summary: The material below is old, but reliable.
Harborview Injury Prevention Center
Rivara, Thompson, Patterson, Thompson
PREVENTION OF BICYCLE-RELATED INJURIES: Helmets, Education, and Legislation
Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 19:293-318 (Volume publication date May 1998) Frederick P. Rivara, Diane C. Thompson, Matthew Q. Patterson, and Robert S. Thompson.
Portion of the abstract: "Helmets have been shown to reduce bicycle-related head injuries for cyclists of all ages involved in all types of crashes including those with motor vehicles. Helmet use has been promoted using educational campaigns, helmet subsidies, and legislation. Careful evaluation of these strategies has shown that these interventions increase helmet use and decrease the incidence of bicycle injuries."
Centers for Disease Control
Evaluation of Legislation and Community Programs
to Increase the use of Bicycle Helmets - Selected Locations
Helmet-use rates are for children except forVictoria, Australia, which included adults.
Helmet use Rates Pre- Post- Location Years Program type Program Program Evaluated Victoria, March 1983- Community 6 percent 36 percent Australia March 1990 campaign Comments: Included education, mass media publicity, support by professional associations and community groups, involvement of bicycling groups, and $10 government rebate for helmet purchases. Victoria, March 1990 Helmet 36 percent 73 percent March 1991 legislation introduced Comments: Hospitalizations for bicycle-related head injuries also decreased by 37 per cent, Howard 1990-1991 Helmet 4 percent 47 percent County, legislation, Maryland community campaign Comments: Activity prompted by bicycling deaths of two children. Use determined by observation. A school-based survey showed 11 percent and 37 per cent. Montgomery 1990-1991 Community 8 percent 19 percent County, campaign Maryland Comments: Use determined by observation. Use determined by school-based survey was 8 per cent and 13 per cent Baltimore 1990-1991 No specific 19 percent 4 percent County, helmet promotion Maryland activities Comments: Served as control county. Use determined by observation. Use determined by a school-based survey was 7 percent and 11 percent. Seattle, 1987-1988 Community 5 percent 14 percent Washington campaign Comments: Included education of parents by physicians; advertising in newspapers, on television, and on radio; school presentations; and discount coupons for helmets. Seattle, 1980-1990 Community 14 percent 33 percent Washington campaign Comments: Follow-up evaluation of bicycle helmet campaign. Seattle, 1990-1993 Community 33 percent 60 percent Washington campaign Comments: Follow-up evaluation of bicycle helmet campaign. Bicycle-related head injuries decreased approximately 67 per cent among children 5-14 years of age who were members of a health maintenance organization. Portland, 1987-1988 No specific 1 percent 4 percent Oregon helmet promotion activities Comments: Control community, use determined by observation. Barrie, 1988-1989 Educational 0 percent 0 percent Ontario program Canada Comments: Use determined by a limited number of observations. Barrie, 1980-1989 Educational 0 percent 22 percent Ontario program and Canada helmet subsidy Comments: Use determined by a limited number of observations.Source:
Injury-Control Recommendations: Bicycle Helmets
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol 44, No. RR-l February 17, 1995
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
U. S. Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services
This chart is part of the source document. The rest is available from CDC.
Swedish Study
Swedish authorities published a paper in 2003 evaluating helmet campaign strategies. The overall conclusion is that a considerable increase in helmet use by cyclists could be achieved by noncompulsory measures, but the use levels are not as high as those achieved by legislation.Dutch Study
A similar study in the Netherlands turned up some different conclusions about helmet use. We have the abstract and a link to the original study in Dutch.Back to the top
Back to the Home Page